Introduction
Dr. Karen Miner-Romanoff introduces you to "State of Ohio vs. Ruben Rhodes"
Court Case Overview
Judge Charles Schneider, Jason Manning, and Joseph Gibson provide you an overview of the case.
Witness #1
Co-Defendant Testimony against Mr. Rhodes. The State offered several co-defendants the opportunity to plea bargain in return for testimony against Ruben Rhodes.
Witness #2
Co-Defendant Testimony against Mr. Rhodes.
Witness #3
Co-Defendant Testimony against Mr. Rhodes.
Witness #4
Co-Defendant Testimony against Mr. Rhodes.
Detective Testimony
Law Enforcement often testifies in court regarding the cases that they investigate in order to provide direct evidence in support of the state’s case.
Pharmaceutical Expert
Please note that the state is establishing the witness’ expertise to testify on the matters included in the testimony.
Rule 29
>Rule 29 is a motion made by defense counsel that essentially states that the evidence is insufficient to go to the jury.
Closing Statements
These arguments provide the jury with a summative review of the case from both sides.
Jury Question #1
The jury may ask questions as they deliberate.
Jury Question #2
The jury may ask questions as they deliberate.
The Verdict
Our criminal justice system relies upon juries to provide justice and truth to the process. They are vital to the goals of our system.
Sentencing
Please pay particular attention to the judges editorial comments as they are valuable to the dual goals of deterrence and accountability.
Court Case Wrap Up
Judge Charles A. Schneider wraps up the case.
